Current:Home > ContactUS government must return land it took and never developed to a Nebraska tribe under new law -AssetLink
US government must return land it took and never developed to a Nebraska tribe under new law
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:58:51
WINNEBAGO, Neb. (AP) — The Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska will soon get back about 1,600 acres (647 hectares) of land the federal government took more than 50 years ago and never developed.
A new law will require the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to return the roughly 2.5-square-mile (6.5-square-kilometer) tract of land along the Missouri River in Iowa it took in 1970 through eminent domain for a recreation project that was never built.
The tribe has been trying for decades to reclaim the land.
“This is a truly historic moment for the Winnebago Tribe as lands that were taken from us over 50 years ago will soon be restored to our tribe,” said Winnebago Tribal Chairwoman Victoria Kitcheyan.
The bill that finally made it happen was backed by the congressional delegations of Nebraska and Iowa.
“Our bill becoming law corrects a decades-old wrong. Now, we can finally return this land to the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska,” U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska said.
The land that will be returned to the Winnebago Tribe was originally part of the reservation created for the tribe in northeastern Nebraska by a treaty in 1865. Part of the land wound up in Iowa because the Missouri River has shifted west over the years. Another parcel of land on the Nebraska side of the river that was taken at the same time has already been returned to the tribe.
In recent years, some tribes in the U.S., Canada and Australia have gotten their rights to ancestral lands restored with the growth of the Land Back movement, which seeks to return land to Indigenous people.
veryGood! (89)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Tyler Goodson, Alabama man featured in 'S-Town' podcast, shot to death during police standoff
- Bus crashes in western Thailand, killing 14 people and injuring more than 30 others
- Jamie Foxx Details Tough Medical Journey in Emotional Speech After Health Scare
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Virginia officer seriously wounded in gunfire exchange that left stabbing suspect dead, police say
- Biden is spending most of the week raising money at events with James Taylor and Steven Spielberg
- Jamie Foxx Details Tough Medical Journey in Emotional Speech After Health Scare
- Jury selection set for Monday for ex-politician accused of killing Las Vegas investigative reporter
- A Nigerian military attack mistakenly bombed a religious gathering and killed civilians
Ranking
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Kenan Thompson Shares Why He Hasn’t Spoken Out About Divorce From Christina Evangeline
- Christmas shopping hangover no more: Build a holiday budget to avoid credit card debt
- Black Americans expect to face racism in the doctor's office, survey finds
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- 2023 Heisman Trophy finalists announced, with three of four being quarterbacks
- The Ultimate Gift Guide for Every Woman in Your Life: Laneige, UGG, Anthropologie, Diptyque & More
- Mental evaluation ordered for Idaho man charged with murder in shooting death of his pregnant wife
Recommendation
US Open player compensation rises to a record $65 million, with singles champs getting $3.6 million
Prince Harry challenges UK government’s decision to strip him of security detail when he moved to US
A Nigerian military attack mistakenly bombed a religious gathering and killed civilians
Putin to discuss Israel-Hamas war during a 1-day trip to Saudi Arabia and UAE
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
'Standing on business': What the internet's latest slang term means and how to use it.
Jonathan Taylor Thomas and More Child Stars All Grown Up Will Have You Feeling Nostalgic AF
Federal judge blocks Montana TikTok ban, state law 'likely violates the First Amendment'